03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
And of course a sexp(x) with sexp(0) = 1 and a negative derivative for x > 0 is absurd. Hence the condition is logical.
tommy1729
tommy1729
|
Growth of superexponential
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Growth of superexponential - by Balarka Sen - 02/26/2013, 11:19 AM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by tommy1729 - 02/26/2013, 10:00 PM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by Balarka Sen - 02/27/2013, 02:19 PM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by sheldonison - 02/27/2013, 06:40 PM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by Balarka Sen - 02/27/2013, 07:24 PM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by tommy1729 - 03/01/2013, 12:11 AM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by tommy1729 - 03/06/2013, 11:51 PM
RE: Growth of superexponential - by tommy1729 - 03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
|