On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ...
#3
I came to realise that I am close to a proof that any formula of the form lim n-> oo ln^[n](f^[x](exp^[n])) for f^[1] entire , cannot be analytic. For certain the probability is at most 1/R where R is the cardinality of the continuum.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... - by tommy1729 - 02/21/2013, 11:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [2sinh] using exp(x) - exp(-3/5 x) tommy1729 2 3,868 06/18/2023, 11:49 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2sinh] exp(x) - exp( - (e-1) x), Low Base Constant (LBC) 1.5056377.. tommy1729 3 5,834 04/30/2023, 01:22 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MSE too] more thoughts on 2sinh tommy1729 1 3,168 02/26/2023, 08:49 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Semi-group iso , tommy's limit fix method and alternative limit for 2sinh method tommy1729 1 4,608 12/30/2022, 11:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question The Etas and Euler Numbers of the 2Sinh Method Catullus 2 5,064 07/18/2022, 10:01 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question A Limit Involving 2sinh Catullus 0 2,855 07/17/2022, 06:15 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Reviving an old idea with 2sinh. tommy1729 7 10,049 06/28/2022, 02:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 9,239 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2sinh^[r](z) = 0 ?? tommy1729 0 4,964 02/23/2016, 11:13 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] Representations by 2sinh^[0.5] tommy1729 1 8,049 11/16/2014, 07:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)