Is this entire expression for tetration legal
#5
(12/10/2012, 03:43 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: With this we define \( \forall \omega, \nu \in \mathbb{C} \):

\( (\Gamma(\omega + 1) (^\omega e)^s) \times(\Gamma(\nu + 1) (^\nu e)^s) = \Gamma(\omega + \nu + 1) (^{\omega+ \nu } e)^s \)

I'm lost at this point. Why do you define tetetration to satisfy this equality? How do you know it's true?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Is this entire expression for tetration legal - by cosurgi - 01/20/2013, 07:32 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Transc entire = exp a + exp b + exp c tommy1729 0 5,054 07/15/2015, 07:37 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [entire exp^0.5] The half logaritm. tommy1729 1 8,731 05/11/2014, 06:10 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 29,882 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is the following expression for tetration useful? JmsNxn 9 27,492 11/14/2012, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression Gottfried 12 36,648 05/26/2008, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)