Is this entire expression for tetration legal
#4
(12/10/2012, 03:43 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: Being quick I'll write the glorious formula; \( \forall b \in \mathbb{R}\,\,;\,\, b > e^{\frac{1}{e}} \):

\( \frac{1}{^\omega b} = \sum_{N=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sum_{k=0}^{N} \frac{(-1)^{N-k}}{(N-k)!(^k b)}}{ \Gamma(\omega - N +1)} \)

considering the equation above ; if we do \( exp(-1/x) \) on both sides that should be equivalent to adding 1 to \( \omega \).

If that is not the case then the fundamental functional equation of tetration is not satisfied.

So can you confirm that doing \( exp(-1/x) \) on both sides does what it is suppose to do ?

For those confused notice \( exp(-1/x) = 1/exp(1/x) \) and \( 1/exp^{[n]}(1/x) = (1/exp(1/x))^{[n]}. \)

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Is this entire expression for tetration legal - by tommy1729 - 12/15/2012, 10:02 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Transc entire = exp a + exp b + exp c tommy1729 0 5,252 07/15/2015, 07:37 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [entire exp^0.5] The half logaritm. tommy1729 1 9,138 05/11/2014, 06:10 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 30,699 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is the following expression for tetration useful? JmsNxn 9 28,215 11/14/2012, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression Gottfried 12 37,705 05/26/2008, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)