Unfortunately it contains at least 3 errors.
And the way to arrive at iteration of logs is hardly " surprising ".
Considering it only has about 6 pages without title and references and those 2 mistakes make me suspiscious , so , i dare to say i doubt the results and also if this is a good advocate for tetration.
In fact 2 errors are quite easy to find and dont require a mathematician.
I do not wish to insult the author but i have to defend the truth , honor and reputation of math and tetration.
Regards
Tommy1729
And the way to arrive at iteration of logs is hardly " surprising ".
Considering it only has about 6 pages without title and references and those 2 mistakes make me suspiscious , so , i dare to say i doubt the results and also if this is a good advocate for tetration.
In fact 2 errors are quite easy to find and dont require a mathematician.
I do not wish to insult the author but i have to defend the truth , honor and reputation of math and tetration.
Regards
Tommy1729

