A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#19
However, the new function described above is equivalent to: \( f(b, t) = \exp_b^{t+2}(-1) \)
which is very interesting, since it's in the orbit from -1 of an exponential, instead of tetration, which is the orbit from 1.

Andrew Robbins
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents - by andydude - 10/20/2007, 07:57 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  can normal tetration be defined as a limit of product tetration? Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,410 05/27/2026, 06:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 2,304 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  i have a seemingly reasonable definition for tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 2,116 10/19/2025, 04:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Real tetration as a limit of complex tetration Daniel 5 12,958 06/20/2023, 07:52 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MSE][NT][MOD][Tetration] tetration primitive root mod p tommy1729 1 4,127 04/03/2023, 06:50 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Computing sqrt 2 with rational functions. tommy1729 0 3,230 03/31/2023, 11:49 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Is the Tetra-Euler Number Rational? Catullus 1 4,601 07/17/2022, 06:37 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Generalized Kneser superfunction trick (the iterated limit definition) MphLee 25 54,494 05/26/2021, 11:55 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  What left to right tetration does that right to left tetration doesn't robo37 0 6,617 06/17/2015, 04:38 PM
Last Post: robo37
  A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. marraco 7 34,905 03/19/2015, 10:45 PM
Last Post: marraco



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)