A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#19
However, the new function described above is equivalent to: \( f(b, t) = \exp_b^{t+2}(-1) \)
which is very interesting, since it's in the orbit from -1 of an exponential, instead of tetration, which is the orbit from 1.

Andrew Robbins
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents - by andydude - 10/20/2007, 07:57 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  can normal tetration be defined as a limit of product tetration? Alex Zuma 2025 0 165 05/27/2026, 06:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  A very special set of tetration bases marcokrt 3 6,587 03/14/2026, 01:43 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,199 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Tetration with complex bases TetrationSheep 0 994 11/13/2025, 10:33 AM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
  i have a seemingly reasonable definition for tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,083 10/19/2025, 04:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,401 09/24/2025, 12:47 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Fractional tetration method Koha 2 6,468 06/05/2025, 01:40 AM
Last Post: Pentalogue
Question Tetration using the integral Pentalogue 0 4,494 05/27/2025, 11:27 PM
Last Post: Pentalogue
  Not about tetration but what do you think about this paper? Ansus 4 6,348 04/12/2025, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Ansus
  A question about tetration from a newbie TetrationSheep 2 6,592 08/26/2024, 12:38 PM
Last Post: TetrationSheep



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)