the extent of generalization
#8
It sounds to me like you refer to i-tetra-i, or \( {}^{i}i \). in your notation, I think you mean \( (a, b, c) = \exp^c_a(b) \) which would actually make \( (i, i, i) = \exp^i_i(i) = \exp^{i+1}_i(1) = {}^{i+1}i \) which is probably not what you were trying to say.

I have never tried to calculate i-tetra-i before. All of the bases that I've tried have been real-valued, but I'll see what I can do for a complex base. I cannot guarantee any results, but I can see what our methods can do for base i.

Andrew Robbins
Reply


Messages In This Thread
the extent of generalization - by Matt D - 10/12/2007, 03:35 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by GFR - 10/12/2007, 10:18 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Matt D - 10/12/2007, 03:14 PM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Gottfried - 10/12/2007, 05:41 PM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Matt D - 10/12/2007, 06:26 PM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Gottfried - 10/13/2007, 11:11 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by andydude - 10/14/2007, 01:39 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Gottfried - 10/14/2007, 09:12 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Gottfried - 10/14/2007, 11:25 AM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Gottfried - 10/14/2007, 06:31 PM
RE: the extent of generalization - by Matt D - 10/15/2007, 04:52 PM
RE: the extent of generalization - by GFR - 10/12/2007, 09:15 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Superroots and a generalization for the Lambert-W Gottfried 22 69,554 12/30/2015, 09:49 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)