( number theory )
#6
(05/13/2011, 01:19 PM)Gottfried Wrote:
(05/13/2011, 08:45 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Why dont you post at mathoverflow?
I got some really good answers there.
Strong people there in various fields of mathematics.

Mathoverflow is not a good place for such questions. It's more a place for research mathematics. But there is the all-level sister forum http://math.stackexchange.com/questions There any serious and focused math question is welcome, even homework, if it has the characteristic, that a mathematical answer can be given (and is expected at all).

Gottfried

i am gratefull for your attempt at help , despite not believing in it.

one can argue that the question needed to be asked differently , stated more like this or that.

but the point is in my experience it does not seem to matter much ...

as evidence that i tried i did post on your advised site , but got reactions similar to sci.math and mathoverflow ... not really surprising ;

if you check out who commented : the same people who are on mathoverflow and sci.math.

in fact i even got insulted * quote * then you are probably not in a position to understand much of what such a search would turn up * end quote *

im not saying these guys blocked or closed the thread because they know its me , it would not have mattered much who had posted it.

other people could have reacted too , but didnt in the period it was still unclosed.

and now the thread is closed , only leaving some bad comments about me.

just as i suspected , similar to sci.math , mathoverflow , wikipedia editors etc

i can honestly say i find most people unfair on the internet.

considering oneself a better mathematician without being able to give a proof or even a comment that matters is arrogant and unfair imho.

not to mention suggesting that the one who asks ( hard ? ) questions barely knows what he is asking.

and also the side-effect of scaring off people who are not so talented (yet) and new to math and afraid to ask questions after reading such comments is not good for math.

check out for yourself :

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...o-goldbach

i might sound like a rebel.

but i did not behave impolite , yet got insulted.

the question was perfectly valid and i did not boost about myself in any way.

all in vain.

seems they only like to answer " homework questions " , generalized nonsense and set theory.

i realize that saying this will make me even less popular in the community , but i will not shut up for anyone !


tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
( number theory ) - by tommy1729 - 05/11/2011, 09:14 PM
RE: ( number theory ) - by bo198214 - 05/13/2011, 08:45 AM
RE: ( number theory ) - by Gottfried - 05/13/2011, 01:19 PM
RE: ( number theory ) - by tommy1729 - 05/15/2011, 06:06 PM
RE: ( number theory ) - by tommy1729 - 05/13/2011, 12:27 PM
RE: ( number theory ) - by bo198214 - 05/13/2011, 08:26 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  X-th iteration where x is a real number Natsugou 1 5,889 10/27/2024, 11:23 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  What is this number (\(\dots 98869612812995910644531\))? marcokrt 1 2,965 05/30/2023, 07:09 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  [UFO] "commutative number theory " f(g) = g(f) tommy1729 0 2,473 03/24/2023, 11:36 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  geometric function theory ideas tommy1729 0 3,022 12/31/2022, 12:19 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Is the Tetra-Euler Number Rational? Catullus 1 3,524 07/17/2022, 06:37 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Natural Properties of the Tetra-Euler Number Catullus 6 10,601 07/01/2022, 08:16 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  " x-theory " tommy1729 1 4,107 08/12/2021, 12:17 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Dynamical Systems and Number Theory Daniel 4 9,715 06/01/2021, 11:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Cellular auto : rule 30 number ? tommy1729 0 5,331 08/03/2016, 08:31 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument. tommy1729 1 7,751 12/08/2015, 11:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)