2 [n] b and 3 [n] b for (large) integer n, b
#2
n = 3:
b > 3 -> 2 [4] b > 3 [3] b

Proof:

For b = 4:
2 [4] 4 = 2 ^ (2 ^ (2 ^ 2)) = 2 ^ (2 ^ 16) = 2 ^ 65536 > 81 = 3 ^ 4 = 3 [3] 4

Let's assume that 2 [4] b > 3 [3] b for some b > 3.
Then we wish to prove that 2 [4] (b + 1) > 3 [3] (b + 1)


2 [4] (b + 1) = 2 ^ (2 [4] b)
> 2 ^ (3 [3] b)
> 3 * (3 [3] b)
= 3 [3] (b + 1)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 2 [n] b and 3 [n] b for (large) integer n, b - by dyitto - 03/09/2011, 10:31 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Frozen digits in any integer tetration marcokrt 2 4,217 08/14/2022, 04:51 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Closed Forms for non Integer Tetration Catullus 1 3,149 07/08/2022, 11:32 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 9,793 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Tetration series for integer exponent. Can you find the pattern? marraco 20 56,191 02/21/2016, 03:27 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Lit: f(x)=log(x) iff x is integer Gottfried 3 14,263 03/17/2015, 11:35 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tommy's conjecture : every positive integer is the sum of at most 8 pentatope numbers tommy1729 0 6,832 08/17/2014, 09:01 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Integer tetration and convergence speed rules marcokrt 5 20,671 12/21/2011, 06:21 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  Observations on branching and integer iterates jaydfox 1 9,109 11/23/2007, 08:31 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)