01/29/2011, 03:32 PM
(01/29/2011, 10:36 AM)bo198214 Wrote:(01/18/2011, 01:44 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: we have studied b^^z and z^^b alot.
they can be expressed by sexp_b and slog_b.
but what about f(z) = a , a^^a = z ?
so apart from superlog and superexp , how about a superlambert ?
Superlambert?
LambertW is the inverse of \( xe^x \) not of \( x^x \).
(Though you can express the inverse of \( x^x \) by LambertW.)
Seems you suggest a misleading naming, do you?
yeah , well maybe we should rename it ... i just like the sound of superlambert , but you got a point.
im open to name suggestions.
or do you suggest solving x*e^^x instead of x^^x ??
regards
tommy1729

