z^^z ?
#6
(01/29/2011, 10:36 AM)bo198214 Wrote:
(01/18/2011, 01:44 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: we have studied b^^z and z^^b alot.

they can be expressed by sexp_b and slog_b.

but what about f(z) = a , a^^a = z ?

so apart from superlog and superexp , how about a superlambert ?

Superlambert?
LambertW is the inverse of \( xe^x \) not of \( x^x \).
(Though you can express the inverse of \( x^x \) by LambertW.)
Seems you suggest a misleading naming, do you?

yeah , well maybe we should rename it ... i just like the sound of superlambert , but you got a point.

im open to name suggestions.

or do you suggest solving x*e^^x instead of x^^x ??

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 01:44 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 09:11 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 09:49 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by bo198214 - 01/29/2011, 10:36 AM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/29/2011, 02:05 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/29/2011, 03:32 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/29/2011, 11:18 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/30/2011, 06:41 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/31/2011, 01:39 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by bo198214 - 02/27/2011, 12:55 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 02/27/2011, 11:01 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by Stan - 04/05/2011, 09:26 AM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 04/06/2011, 03:15 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)