z^^z ?
#5
(01/29/2011, 10:36 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Superlambert?
I know that - this new name is inverse of x^(superE^^x) but I don't know if this new formula is correct.

superE (= super euler) ~= 3.088532... Smile

Reply


Messages In This Thread
z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 01:44 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 09:11 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/18/2011, 09:49 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by bo198214 - 01/29/2011, 10:36 AM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/29/2011, 02:05 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/29/2011, 03:32 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/29/2011, 11:18 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 01/30/2011, 06:41 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by nuninho1980 - 01/31/2011, 01:39 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by bo198214 - 02/27/2011, 12:55 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 02/27/2011, 11:01 PM
RE: z^^z ? - by Stan - 04/05/2011, 09:26 AM
RE: z^^z ? - by tommy1729 - 04/06/2011, 03:15 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)