Our tetration concept is a wrong way?
#3
(11/06/2010, 01:30 AM)mike3 Wrote: Well this approach looks to be of no use. Note that

\( f_a(f_a^{-1}(x) + \frac{1}{h}) \)

is \( \frac{1}{h} \) iterate of the "subfunction" of \( f_a \), which is uniquely given by \( f_a(f_a^{-1}(x) + 1) \). Thus h iterates of it yields that subfunction, regardless of the specific superfunction used (i.e. a 1-cyclic transform of it will give the same subfunction, hence the same "iterative derivative".). Essentially, there is apparently no difference between this and the "discrete iterative derivative".

Yes. I have noticed that. What about using the x instead of 1 as in the current post?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by Ansus - 11/06/2010, 12:08 AM
RE: Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by Ansus - 11/06/2010, 04:57 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Challenging the concept of real tetration Daniel 2 4,249 07/04/2022, 03:09 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  What am I doing wrong here? JmsNxn 2 10,232 05/26/2011, 02:21 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)