(07/25/2010, 03:39 PM)bo198214 Wrote:Hmm, I got no better result yet, but maybe you see something further.Code:14879 1.44270934056096
29759 1.44270932083314
oo 1.44269504088896?
I reformulated this into
\(
\lim_{n->\infty} (n+1) \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \( 1-\frac1{2^k} \)^n*\frac1{2^k} =^{?}_{ } \frac1{\ln\(2\)} \)
or
\(
\lim_{n->\infty} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \( 1-\frac1{2^k} \)^n*\frac1{2^k} =^{?}_{ } \frac1{\ln\(2^{n+1}\)}
\)
to remove the binomials first. So far I get numerically the same results as in your examples (first version of my equation).
Though I don't see much more clearer here.
Perhaps we can relate this to Euler's "false logarithmic series" which provides a polynomial approximation to the log which is only valid at the integers (but not at zero(!)) and has a sinusoidal deviation from the true log-function - but I didn't go deeper into this yet...
Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel

