A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#6
GFR Wrote:I have examined with interest the "details" shown in the UVIR's posting. Unfortunately, I cannot agree with putting:
b # n = y => b = y # (1/n).

Quote:There has already been at least one peer reviewed paper on this definition of tetraroots, so whether you "agree" or not is irrelevant.

The tetra root is defined as the inverse of the x#n but it has nothing to do with x#(1/n).


GFR Wrote:Moreover, I think that these two "tetration" formulas don't have any point in common. Their sets are disjoint. There is no similarity with the "exponentiation" case, where the power and the root functions are described in the same domain and we can find a root function representable as a power. I know but, unfortunately, ... this is the real problem.

I absolutely agree with Gianfranco.
The reason why \( x^{1/n} \) and \( \sqrt[n]{x} \) coincide is that \( (x^a)^b=x^{ab} \). If we demand this law to be valid also for rational exponents then \( (x^{1/n})^n = x^{n/n}=x^1=x \) and thatswhy \( x^{1/n} \) must be the inverse of \( x^n \). Unfortunately \( {}^a({}^b x)={}^{ab}x \) is no more valid.

Quote:The tetraroot is the exact reverse operation of tetration, since
Nobody denies that the tetraroot is the inverse of \( {}^nx \) (by definition) however to define \( {}^{1/n}x \) as being the tetraroot is quite arbitrary and additionally does not coincide with our other methods. As far as I have seen the 3 definitions of \( {}^y x \) (via Daniel's continuous iteration at the first fixed point, via Gottfried's matrixoperator method and via Andrew's natural slog) coincide for \( 1<x<e^{1/e} \). As an example I graphed \( {}^{1/2}x \) (via the method of continuous iteration at the first fixed point) (red) in comparison with the inverse of \( {}^{2}x \) (blue):

   
Curve 1 is \( {}^{1/2}x \)
Curve 2 is the identity function.
Curve 3 is \( {}^2x \) and
Curve 4 is the inverse of \( {}^2x \) (2nd superroot)

Quote:\(
lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}{^{1/n}}e=y\Leftrightarrow\\
e=lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}{^n} y\Leftrightarrow\\
y=e^{1/e}
\)

Sorry Ioannis, but this rather proves that it is the wrong definition. As \( {}^xe \) should be a function continuous in \( x \) it must
\( \lim_{n\to\infty}{}^{1/n}e={}^0e=1\neq e^{1/e} \)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents - by bo198214 - 09/30/2007, 06:18 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  can normal tetration be defined as a limit of product tetration? Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,414 05/27/2026, 06:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 2,312 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  i have a seemingly reasonable definition for tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 2,119 10/19/2025, 04:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Real tetration as a limit of complex tetration Daniel 5 12,966 06/20/2023, 07:52 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MSE][NT][MOD][Tetration] tetration primitive root mod p tommy1729 1 4,131 04/03/2023, 06:50 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Computing sqrt 2 with rational functions. tommy1729 0 3,236 03/31/2023, 11:49 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Is the Tetra-Euler Number Rational? Catullus 1 4,603 07/17/2022, 06:37 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Generalized Kneser superfunction trick (the iterated limit definition) MphLee 25 54,510 05/26/2021, 11:55 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  What left to right tetration does that right to left tetration doesn't robo37 0 6,619 06/17/2015, 04:38 PM
Last Post: robo37
  A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. marraco 7 34,908 03/19/2015, 10:45 PM
Last Post: marraco



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)