01/27/2010, 07:51 PM
(01/26/2010, 11:19 PM)bo198214 Wrote: ....I appreciate the educational update on the notation. Your description in this post of Kneser's approach already makes a lot more sense, and I will continue working on it until I fully understand it. I also updated the notation in my reply (with the graph) using \( \psi^{-1}(z) \) as sexp developed from the fixed point, and \( \psi(z) \) as the Abel function (inverse sexp, based on the fixed point).
Your theta should be the Riemann mapping that maps the upper halfplane to the union of the by integer translated images \( \psi(H_0) \).
Please continue from here with unified denotation.
- Shel

