Operations with fractional index between + and * ?
#6
Just had another thought on this matter.

In order for this interpolation to work, you should also check to see if it applies for ranks above 3, for example (to use a combination Knuth-Bromer-Mueller arrow system), we have the first 5 lower hyperoperations are: \( \{a + b, ab, a{\uparrow}b, a{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b, a{\downarrow}{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b\} \), and so we should check that:
\( \mathcal{S}[{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b](x) = \log_a(\log_a(x)) \), and
\( \mathcal{S}[{\downarrow}{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b](x) = \log_a(\log_a(\log_a(x))) \)
and I have a feeling that this is not the case.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Operations with fractional index between + and * ? - by andydude - 10/20/2009, 08:42 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 8,314 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations Catullus 48 78,144 09/08/2022, 02:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,251 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 15,341 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 28,807 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  On to C^\infty--and attempts at C^\infty hyper-operations JmsNxn 11 24,531 03/02/2021, 09:55 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Could there be an "arctic geometry" by raising the rank of all operations? Syzithryx 2 10,948 07/24/2019, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Syzithryx
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 9,942 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators JmsNxn 5 22,997 07/07/2014, 06:47 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Negative, Fractional, and Complex Hyperoperations KingDevyn 2 19,614 05/30/2014, 08:19 AM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)