10/16/2009, 06:28 AM
(10/15/2009, 09:39 PM)Base-Acid Tetration Wrote: I DID say:
BAT Wrote:Let Tet_b(z) be the principal branch of tetration.I fixed the proof to make this clearer.
I know that you said it *in the proof*. But its of no use there.
If you have restricting conditions you have to mention them in the theorem, otherwise the theorem is false.
Though I still think the theorem doesnt need this restriction. As I mentioned I think it is still true if you allow the continuation from above onto the ray (-2,-oo) (Like the logarithm is also defined on (0,-oo)) because there are still enough singularities on this ray that you can employ for your proof.
