Oh damn I incidently overwrite your post with my administrator powers, sorry for that.
My answer is now seen in your post *sigh* sorry for that.
Can you reestablish your old post? I write my answer again here:
Oehm, just compute the powerseries and then the Carleman matrix has as line m the m-th power of the powerseries.
Or do you want to know the formula?
The powerseries should have as convergence radius the distance from the development point to the fixed point. (If we assume that the islog has no other singularities than the primary fixed point(s))
My answer is now seen in your post *sigh* sorry for that.
Can you reestablish your old post? I write my answer again here:
(08/25/2009, 05:25 PM)jaydfox Wrote: And just to be sure, how are you calculating the C matrix for e^(x+1)-1?
Oehm, just compute the powerseries and then the Carleman matrix has as line m the m-th power of the powerseries.
Or do you want to know the formula?
Quote:I don't mean to be pedantic, but if I recall correctly, when I had investigated this line before, I found that the radius of convergence could be adversely affected when the power series was developed at a point other than 0, and truncation of the computed power series became necessary.
The powerseries should have as convergence radius the distance from the development point to the fixed point. (If we assume that the islog has no other singularities than the primary fixed point(s))