The "cheta" function
#27
(08/11/2009, 07:46 PM)jaydfox Wrote: Well, it can actually be applied to any base greater than 1.

So did someone check already whether base conversion of regular iteration gives again regular iteration (say at the lower fixed point)?

Quote: I assume you're referring to where I said:

jaydfox Wrote:And at any rate, for base b>eta, it definitely does not converge on the way "up", even if by some miracle it manages to converge on the way back "down"

For bases less than or equal to eta, it will converge on the lower fixed point as we go "up". For bases larger than eta, there aren't any real fixed points, so convergence never happens.
Sorry, I dont know what you mean by "converging on the way up/down".

Quote:Also, my change of base formula works from infinity down, so to speak, so for bases less than or equal to eta, we can't properly get to 0, so it doesn't give tetration per se (though it is a form of super-exponentiation, just not centered at 0).

If you mean the translation in the argument I wouldnt care about that.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 09:36 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 09:37 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 11:09 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/06/2009, 07:56 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 10:21 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 10:42 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/06/2009, 08:55 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/06/2009, 09:33 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/06/2009, 09:54 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/06/2009, 10:02 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/06/2009, 10:26 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/06/2009, 11:05 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/07/2009, 07:26 AM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/07/2009, 08:15 AM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/07/2009, 04:18 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/07/2009, 06:49 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/07/2009, 07:24 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/07/2009, 08:41 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/07/2009, 05:14 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by Gottfried - 08/07/2009, 06:03 PM
RE: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/11/2009, 10:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is there any ways to compute iterations of a oscillating function ? Shanghai46 3 7,907 10/15/2023, 11:21 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Anyone have any ideas on how to generate this function? JmsNxn 3 5,105 05/21/2023, 03:30 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  [MSE] Mick's function Caleb 1 3,885 03/08/2023, 02:33 AM
Last Post: Caleb
  [special] binary partition zeta function tommy1729 1 3,831 02/27/2023, 01:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [NT] Extending a Jacobi function using Riemann Surfaces JmsNxn 2 4,880 02/26/2023, 08:22 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  toy zeta function tommy1729 0 2,799 01/20/2023, 11:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  geometric function theory ideas tommy1729 0 2,908 12/31/2022, 12:19 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Iterated function convergence Daniel 1 4,133 12/18/2022, 01:40 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Fibonacci as iteration of fractional linear function bo198214 48 56,875 09/14/2022, 08:05 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Constructing an analytic repelling Abel function JmsNxn 0 3,114 07/11/2022, 10:30 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)