regular slog
#18
(10/07/2007, 10:30 PM)bo198214 Wrote: Now there is the the so called principal Schroeder function \( \sigma_f \) of a function \( f \) with fixed point 0 with slope \( s:=f'(0) \), \( 0<s<1 \) given by:

\( \sigma_f(x) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{f^{\circ n}(x)}{s^n} \)

This function particularly yields the regular iteration at 0, via \( f^{\circ t}(x)=\sigma^{-1}(s^t\sigma(x)) \).

Sometimes a thing needs a whole life to be recognized...

In the matrix-method I dealt with the eigen-decomposition of the (triangular) dxp_t() -Bellmatrix U_t to satisfy the relation

\( \hspace{24} U_t = W * D * W^{-1 } \)

While the recursion to compute W and W^-1 efficiently is easy and is working well, I did not have a deeper idea about the structure of the columns in W. Now I found, it just agrees with the above formula:

\( \hspace{24} W = \lim_{h\to\infty} {U_t}^h * diag({U_t}^h)^{-1} \)

which is exactly the above formula; we even can write this, if we refer to the second column of U_t^h as F°h, the second column of W as S, and s = F[1] while F°h[1] = F[1]^h =s^h , then we have

\( \hspace{24} S = \lim_{h\to\infty} \frac {F^{\circ h}}{s^h} \)

Something *very* stupid ... <sigh>
But, well, now also this detail is explained for me.

<Hmmm I don't know why the forum software merges my two replies (to two previous posts of Henryk) into one So here is the second post>




(04/02/2009, 02:31 PM)bo198214 Wrote: This is the diagonal matrix:
\( M=\begin{pmatrix}
c &0 & 0 &\dots &0\\
0 & c^2 & 0&\dots& 0\\
&&\vdots&\\
0 & &\dots& 0 & c^n\\
\end{pmatrix} \)
I think Gottfried calls this the Vandermonde matrix.
Not exactly. I call the Vandermonde-*matrix* VZ (and ZV=VZ~) the *collection* of consecutive vandermonde V(x)-vectors

´ VZ = [V(0), V(1) , V(2), V(3), ...] \\ Vandermondematrix

Your M is just c*dV( c) in my notation: the vandermondevector V( c) used as diagonalmatrix (and since the first entry is not c^0 I noted the additional factor c)

Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
regular slog - by bo198214 - 10/07/2007, 10:30 PM
RE: regular slog - by andydude - 10/20/2007, 06:02 PM
RE: regular slog - by bo198214 - 11/02/2007, 07:12 PM
RE: regular slog - by bo198214 - 11/02/2007, 07:18 PM
RE: regular slog - by andydude - 11/05/2007, 07:58 AM
RE: regular slog - by bo198214 - 11/05/2007, 12:12 PM
RE: regular slog - by andydude - 11/06/2007, 02:14 AM
RE: regular slog - by bo198214 - 11/06/2007, 11:25 AM
RE: regular slog - by Gottfried - 07/29/2009, 11:07 AM
RE: regular slog - by bo198214 - 07/31/2009, 08:55 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question E^^.5 and Slog(e,.5) Catullus 7 11,141 07/22/2022, 02:20 AM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Slog(Exponential Factorial(x)) Catullus 19 23,758 07/13/2022, 02:38 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Slog(x^^^2) Catullus 1 3,278 07/10/2022, 04:40 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Slog(e4) Catullus 0 2,597 06/16/2022, 03:27 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  A support for Andy's (P.Walker's) slog-matrix-method Gottfried 4 12,166 03/08/2021, 07:13 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Some slog stuff tommy1729 15 62,400 05/14/2015, 09:25 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form Gottfried 7 25,842 09/29/2014, 11:39 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  A limit exercise with Ei and slog. tommy1729 0 6,200 09/09/2014, 08:00 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A system of functional equations for slog(x) ? tommy1729 3 14,742 07/28/2014, 09:16 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  slog(superfactorial(x)) = ? tommy1729 3 14,171 06/02/2014, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)