The upper superexponential
#14
(05/11/2009, 12:55 PM)sheldonison Wrote: Are \( F_{2,3} \) and \( F_{4,3} \) the same two functions in the Bummer post?

yes. They are also related to the earlier post which considers the two regular half iterates of \( \exp_{\sqrt{2}} \) on the interval (2,4), these are:
\( {\exp_{\sqrt{2}}}^{[1/2]}(z)=F_{2,3}(1/2+F_{2,3}^{-1}(z)) \)
and
\( {\exp_{\sqrt{2}}}^{[1/2]}(z)=F_{4,3}(1/2+F_{4,3}^{-1}(z)) \).

Quote:Could you comment on how the behavior of the two functions differ in the complex plane?
... Do they have the same periodicity?
... Does only one have singularities?

\( F_{4,3} \) is entire, has period \( 2\pi i/\ln(2\ln(2)) \).
\( F_{2,3} \) is not entire, has period \( 2\pi i/\ln(\ln(2)) \).
Dmitrii can perhaps tell more about the singularities.

Quote: Do both functions have the same values at z=+/-i*infinity?
They have no limit along the imaginary axis because they are imaginary periodic.

Quote:Given that \( F_{2,3}(z)= F_{4,3}(z) \) at all integer values of z, then can these two functions be expressed in terms of each other, where \( F_{2,3}= F_{4,3}(x+\theta(x)) \)? Is the \( \theta(x) \) function analytic?

Yes, \( \theta(z)=F_{4,3}^{-1} ( F_{2,3}(z)) -z \) is analytic, though may somewhere have non-real singularities.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 03/29/2009, 11:23 AM
RE: The upper superexponential - by andydude - 03/31/2009, 04:29 AM
RE: The upper superexponential - by sheldonison - 04/03/2009, 03:06 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 04/03/2009, 04:22 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by sheldonison - 04/05/2009, 12:45 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 04/06/2009, 06:35 AM
RE: The upper superexponential - by Kouznetsov - 05/10/2009, 02:13 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by sheldonison - 05/11/2009, 12:55 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 05/11/2009, 01:21 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by sheldonison - 05/11/2009, 08:12 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 05/11/2009, 08:31 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by Kouznetsov - 05/12/2009, 08:54 AM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 06/01/2009, 07:24 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by tommy1729 - 04/05/2009, 07:05 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by sheldonison - 04/22/2009, 05:02 PM
RE: The upper superexponential - by bo198214 - 04/22/2009, 05:34 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the beta-method is non-zero in the upper half plane JmsNxn 0 3,294 09/01/2021, 01:57 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Growth of superexponential Balarka Sen 7 26,589 03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Nowhere analytic superexponential convergence sheldonison 14 51,971 02/10/2011, 07:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  superexponential below -2 bo198214 10 28,576 05/27/2008, 01:09 PM
Last Post: GFR



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)