Functional super-iteration and hierarchy of functional hyper-iterations
#14
Quote:If we take the equations as recursive definitions then \( \operatorname{It} \) is only defined for functions in the second argument that are constant. Thatswhy I proposed the different version.

Why? If one defined the It operator for functions in the second argument the definition would not be a "recursive" definition? then say that the functional equations are true for the It operator for all functions, but the equations are not "recursive". ok.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Functional super-iteration and hierarchy of functional composition-based operations - by Base-Acid Tetration - 05/03/2009, 09:45 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How could we define negative hyper operators? Shanghai46 2 6,365 11/27/2022, 05:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Complex Hardy Hierarchy Catullus 3 6,721 11/09/2022, 05:57 PM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,334 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Circulation and the Fast-Growing Hierarchy Catullus 20 30,909 09/24/2022, 12:36 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Hyper-Operational Salad Numbers Catullus 9 14,591 09/17/2022, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations Catullus 48 70,653 09/08/2022, 02:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 6,470 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 13,659 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Weak Hyper-Operational Etas and Euler Numbers Catullus 0 3,006 06/17/2022, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 6 22,531 06/16/2022, 10:33 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)