02/18/2009, 04:03 PM
Ansus Wrote:I would not recommend Mathematica for the numerical evaluation of the Cauchi integrals; it is slow. For the base e, the Taylor expansions are already calculated;Quote:No. Until now, only the integral equation.It it possible to compute Tetration in Mathematica using your method?
with these expanssions, the evaluation of tetration and its derivatives is fast.
You may use the code from
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Tetration...l.jpg/code
Quote:Is it possible to find an expression of, say \( (\text{sexp}_e x)' \) in 0?I cannot yet answer. I hope to answer this question later.
Why I ask it? Because there is a property:
\( \ln f'(x)=f(-1)+f(0)+...+f(x-1) + \ln f'(-1) \)
for tetration with natural base \( \text{sexp}_e x \) and integer x (note also that \( \ln f'(-1)=\ln f'(0) \)).
Quote: did you discover some new functional/differential equations that tetration may satisfy, such as change-of-base formula, properties of derivatives/integral or relationship with other functions.Not yet. Use the code above, try to guess some properties and try to prove them.
Quote:By the way, can you plot a graph of tetration \( \text{sexp}_{\sqrt 2} x \)?Yes. Red dotted curve at
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Image:TetrationReal.jpg
Quote:Is it symmetric against y=-x line?Wow! I did not check.. Perhaps, I should.

