02/17/2009, 12:30 AM
[/quote]
Well, because \( F(x) = w^x - 1 \) and \( G(x) = w^{x/w} = e^x \) are topologically conjugate (where \( w = -W(-1) \)), I kind of skipped a step and thought of F (which has a fixed point of 0) and G (which has a fixed point of w) at the same time.
Also, I do understand the general idea of tommy's method, to make a function with a fixed point at 0, as a limit of a function with a fixed point not at zero. It makes sense. I just need to sit down at look over the math for a week or so, to convince myself that it all works, and that it gives new insight to the problem.
Andrew Robbins
[/quote]
ive been absent for a few days , but im thinking ( working ? ) on related ideas.
such as convergeance acceleration.
or a zero at other points then 0.
i dont think my fixed point at 0 gives a convex solution to tetration ...
i will post a conjecture soon.
regards
tommy1729
Well, because \( F(x) = w^x - 1 \) and \( G(x) = w^{x/w} = e^x \) are topologically conjugate (where \( w = -W(-1) \)), I kind of skipped a step and thought of F (which has a fixed point of 0) and G (which has a fixed point of w) at the same time.
Also, I do understand the general idea of tommy's method, to make a function with a fixed point at 0, as a limit of a function with a fixed point not at zero. It makes sense. I just need to sit down at look over the math for a week or so, to convince myself that it all works, and that it gives new insight to the problem.
Andrew Robbins
[/quote]
ive been absent for a few days , but im thinking ( working ? ) on related ideas.
such as convergeance acceleration.
or a zero at other points then 0.
i dont think my fixed point at 0 gives a convex solution to tetration ...
i will post a conjecture soon.
regards
tommy1729

