non-natural operation ranks
#3
Ivars Wrote:I was thinking of a function like:

\( b[t]z=F(b,t,z) \) so that for every combination of 3 at least complex variables we get one as a result.

Exactly, everybody thinks of such a function. Thatswhy I showed a direction how one can obtain such a function, i.e. by:

\( b[t]x=E^{\circ t-1}(f_{1,b})(x) \).

where \( E \) is not a function, but an operator that maps functions to functions. The idea is to apply non-natural iteration to such an operator in a similar way as we apply non-natural iteration to a function. If we can compute non-natural iterates of functions via matrices, perhaps we can compute non-natural iterates of operators by the by Andrew mentioned tensors, who knows.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
non-natural operation ranks - by bo198214 - 05/02/2008, 10:11 PM
RE: non-natural operation ranks - by Ivars - 05/25/2008, 05:31 PM
RE: non-natural operation ranks - by bo198214 - 05/25/2008, 07:30 PM
RE: non-natural operation ranks - by andydude - 05/27/2008, 06:31 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question [Question] What are ranks? In your opinion. MphLee 20 28,215 10/28/2024, 12:00 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  "associativity degree" of an operation (from MathSE) MphLee 1 8,589 05/21/2014, 10:23 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  left-right iteraton in right-divisible magmas, and fractional ranks. MphLee 1 9,014 05/14/2014, 03:51 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  [MO] Example using operation between + and * Gottfried 0 5,834 12/08/2010, 03:23 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)