Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression
#6
I think I've resolved my brain-scattering concerning the ordering in my previous post now. It was just confusion, when I tried to get access to the understanding of the sequence of increasing heights "from the scratch" by composing appropriate and "near-appropriate" functions.

Anyway, what is still surprising, is, that the \( \sigma \)-function seems to have an exponential characteristic. I'd expected something near a logarithmic characteristic instead.
This is \( \sigma(x) \) or "p_b(x)" (as denoted in the previous post) for b~1.345 (u=0.5, t=exp(u), b=exp(u/t)=t^(1/t))

   
Strange...

Gottfried
[update]: Plot updated ,code updated for better readability [/update]
Code:
n=96 \\ set matrix-size; 96 terms for powerseries
fmt(200,12) \\ set internal float-precision to 200 dec digits

\\ set base-parameter b
[u = 0.5,t=exp(u),b=exp(u/t),bl = u/t] \\ b = t^(1/t)

\\ the carleman-matrix Bb is not needed, instead we use the analytically
\\ determined Bell-matrix UtA of the decomposition Bb = (P^(-t))~ * UtA * (P^t)~
\\ This decomposition is only correct for the untruncated case, so we have to determine
\\ UtA analytically

\\ create Bell-matrix for regular iteration  b^x using fixpoint t
Ut  = dV(u)*fS2F;    \\ analytically; from factorially scaled Stirlingnumbers 2'nd kind
         \\ Ut performs x -> t^x - 1
         \\ uses fixpoint-shift " x'=x/t-1 "
UtA = dV(1/t)* Ut * dV(t);    \\ modifies the fixpoint-shift to " x'=x-t "
         \\ so UtA performs x -> b^(x+t) - t  

\\ diagonalization of Bell-matrix, returns parameters and X,dV(u),X^-1
UtAKenn = APT_Init2EW(UtA);
X = UtAKenn[2];     \\ the eigenvector-matrix of UtA
\\ note, that the eigenvector-matrix W of the Carleman-matrix Bb is W= P~^t * X

\\ Schroeder-function-plot
evec=ESum(2.5)[n,];   \\ create coefficients-vector for Eulersummation order 2.5
                  \\ this was checked against smaller orders, differences occur 3.2<x<5 (1e-9 <diff<1e6)
sigma(x,x0=t) = evec*dV(x-x0)*X[,2]   \\ define Schroeder function (perform implicitely fixpoint-shift using X=UtAKenn[2])
                               \\ uses also Euler-summation to extend range for x

list = matrix(n,2); \\ n=96
for(k=0,n-1,k1=1.0*k/10-3;list[1+k,]=[k1,sigma(k1)])
%box >plot list \\ from box "plot" transfer coordinates to Excel "Schroederfunction.xls"  in csv-format
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Understanding Schröder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/19/2008, 12:02 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Extended Schroeder equation Shanghai46 2 6,305 03/23/2025, 11:24 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Understanding \(f(z,\theta) = e^{e^{i\theta}z} - 1\) JmsNxn 23 24,307 01/23/2023, 02:38 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Matrix question for Gottfried Daniel 6 9,953 12/10/2022, 09:33 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Constructing an analytic repelling Abel function JmsNxn 0 3,316 07/11/2022, 10:30 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A support for Andy's (P.Walker's) slog-matrix-method Gottfried 4 12,699 03/08/2021, 07:13 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Moving between Abel's and Schroeder's Functional Equations Daniel 1 8,036 01/16/2020, 10:08 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Tommy's matrix method for superlogarithm. tommy1729 0 6,338 05/07/2016, 12:28 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [split] Understanding Kneser Riemann method andydude 7 27,850 01/13/2016, 10:58 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form Gottfried 7 26,649 09/29/2014, 11:39 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Is this entire expression for tetration legal JmsNxn 4 15,066 01/20/2013, 07:32 PM
Last Post: cosurgi



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)