04/30/2008, 10:49 AM
bo198214 Wrote:(... perhaps you can tell me, what you do with all the money before you reach your home!)It (the money) just collapses and I implode!!
It is like the my hypothetical "sublime mathematical nonsense" operator, such as:
Smn(x) := a[0]<0>(x) >< x (neq x).
The Smn() operator would be such that it could modifiy any variable x, only when (IFF) it IS NOT applied to it (or applied with ZERO iterations). Actually, this could give an idea of what "imagination" might be. Unfortunately, it was "imagined" at the rank s=0 level.
Smn(x) would not even be the contrary of the identity operator, because:
Id(x) = x, i.e.: all x's are fixpoints of Id(x) ...
Nid(x) >< x, i. e.: Nid(x) has no fixpoint ! ...
In fact, both Id() and Nid() are applied at least once, while Smn() is supposed to refer to a fhypothetical a[0]() operator, applied only (so to say) ZERO times. Sublime nonsense indeed!!!
Sorry about that. Having said that, I remain,
Confusingly yours
GFR