Laws and Orders
#25
bo198214 Wrote:However we exploring new grounds in mathematics and not in physics. The only relation to physics I can see so far is that you have an axis \( ict \) in special relativity. However mostly physics uses mathematics and not vice versa.

You can always choose \( ct=1 \) and drop dimensionality. For me, it helps to understand math by "imagining" \( I \) as continuos imaginary time that has certain relationships with other numbers which also might have physical interpretations. It might not work always, but also its not forbidden to use such analogy for certain dynamic understanding of mathematics, I guess.

Ivars
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/23/2008, 09:17 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by andydude - 04/23/2008, 11:44 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:39 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/24/2008, 09:38 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:24 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/25/2008, 04:40 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/25/2008, 08:24 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Catullus - 06/28/2022, 06:50 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by tommy1729 - 06/28/2022, 02:43 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/26/2008, 10:43 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 12:50 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/27/2008, 10:56 AM
RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 10:18 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 05/02/2008, 09:47 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/20/2008, 07:08 PM
RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/25/2008, 03:10 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Question for Bo] about formal Ackermann laws MphLee 6 10,084 12/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 13,958 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)