The balanced hyperop sequence
#2
bo198214 Wrote:I also didnt think about zeration in the context of the balanced mother law. We have (a+1)[0](a+1)=a+2 which changes to a[0]a=a+1 by substituting a+1=a. However this seems to contradict (a+2)[0](a+2)=a+4. So maybe there is no zeration here.

Yes, I completely agree with you. But I would prove it differently, as I did in an email to you awhile back.

\( x[n+1]2^t = f_n^t(x) \) as you mentioned, so
\( x[1]1 = f_0^0(x) = x \) because it is the identity function, but
\( x[1]1 = x + 1 \) by definition of addition!
therefore, \( f_0(x) = x[0]x \) cannot exist.

Andrew Robbins
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The balanced hyperop sequence - by bo198214 - 04/14/2008, 08:44 AM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by andydude - 04/18/2008, 05:23 PM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by bo198214 - 04/18/2008, 05:58 PM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by bo198214 - 04/18/2008, 06:20 PM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by andydude - 04/20/2008, 02:28 AM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by bo198214 - 04/26/2008, 07:20 PM
RE: The balanced hyperop sequence - by bo198214 - 11/30/2009, 11:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Name for sequence y=0[0]0. y=1[1]1, y=2[2]2, y= n[n]n, y=x[x]x, y=i[i]i, y=z[z]z etc? Ivars 11 31,689 07/08/2022, 09:08 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Sequence Interpolation Catullus 1 3,436 06/09/2022, 04:30 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)