04/23/2023, 07:15 PM
Ok this is very sketchy, I ignore branches and validity and locality and complex analysis and such so take with a grain of salt.
f f = id
g h = h g = id
f = g( 1 - h(x) )
so
f(exp(x)) = exp(f(x))
g( 1 - h exp ) = exp g(1 - h)
g( 1 - h exp g ) = exp g(1 - x)
g( 1 - h exp g(1-x) ) = exp(g(x))
1 - x = x if x = 1/2
g( 1 - h(exp(g(1/2))) ) = exp(g(1/2))
exp(g(1/2)) = Q
g(1 - h(Q)) = Q
f(Q) = Q
so
f(exp(Q)) = exp(f(Q))
f(exp(Q)) = exp(Q)
so exp(Q) is another fixpoint for f ?
also
g(1 - h(Q)) = Q , g(h(Q)) = Q
so
1 - h(Q) = h(Q)
so h(Q) = 1/2 = h(exp(g(1/2))) = 1/2
but also
h(g(1/2)) = 1/2.
so maybe h(exp(x)) = h(x) ?
But then g( h(exp(x)) ) = g(h(x)) = x and = (gh) exp = exp(x)
contradiction.
I need a drink ...
regards
tommy1729
f f = id
g h = h g = id
f = g( 1 - h(x) )
so
f(exp(x)) = exp(f(x))
g( 1 - h exp ) = exp g(1 - h)
g( 1 - h exp g ) = exp g(1 - x)
g( 1 - h exp g(1-x) ) = exp(g(x))
1 - x = x if x = 1/2
g( 1 - h(exp(g(1/2))) ) = exp(g(1/2))
exp(g(1/2)) = Q
g(1 - h(Q)) = Q
f(Q) = Q
so
f(exp(Q)) = exp(f(Q))
f(exp(Q)) = exp(Q)
so exp(Q) is another fixpoint for f ?
also
g(1 - h(Q)) = Q , g(h(Q)) = Q
so
1 - h(Q) = h(Q)
so h(Q) = 1/2 = h(exp(g(1/2))) = 1/2
but also
h(g(1/2)) = 1/2.
so maybe h(exp(x)) = h(x) ?
But then g( h(exp(x)) ) = g(h(x)) = x and = (gh) exp = exp(x)
contradiction.
I need a drink ...
regards
tommy1729

