The gaussian method idea variant method :
see : https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationfor...p?tid=1339
R(s) = exp( tr(s) * R(s) )
and tr(s) strictly rises from 0 at s = -oo to 1 at s = + oo in a fast way.
The gaussian method had t(s) = ( 1 + erf(s) )/2.
R(s) uses tr(s) = ( 1 + erf(2sinh(c s)) )/2
For some real c that makes it analytic.
Now 2 sinh(c s) is periodic with period V.
So this V is isomorphic to a function fV(z) such that
fV(exp(x)) = exp(fV(x))
and fV(fV(x)) = x.
***
The interesting part is that this might relate to caleb ideas.
Maybe assuming the periodicity is continuation beyond a boundary, where boundary implies natural boundary ( not analytic ) , not converging or not satisfying the basis equations.
In that case one might get a " fake " solution.
( not to confuse with fake function theory )
regards
tommy1729
see : https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationfor...p?tid=1339
R(s) = exp( tr(s) * R(s) )
and tr(s) strictly rises from 0 at s = -oo to 1 at s = + oo in a fast way.
The gaussian method had t(s) = ( 1 + erf(s) )/2.
R(s) uses tr(s) = ( 1 + erf(2sinh(c s)) )/2
For some real c that makes it analytic.
Now 2 sinh(c s) is periodic with period V.
So this V is isomorphic to a function fV(z) such that
fV(exp(x)) = exp(fV(x))
and fV(fV(x)) = x.
***
The interesting part is that this might relate to caleb ideas.
Maybe assuming the periodicity is continuation beyond a boundary, where boundary implies natural boundary ( not analytic ) , not converging or not satisfying the basis equations.
In that case one might get a " fake " solution.
( not to confuse with fake function theory )
regards
tommy1729

