An old paper I did, I think deserves its own thread

[Daniel]

I always loved the introduction. It is inspired and sublime as most of your papers. To bad that it is impossible for me to digest the topic once you hit the gas with your wall sof conditions for theorems and lemmas.

My friend who's a philosophy major; and who is a published analytic philosopher, hated my introduction. "Why are you sexualizing the Gamma function...?"

I mean, if you don't think the Gamma function is sexy as fuck, maybe math just ain't for you

Better than the term in my first paper - transexponential function.