[to do] fully iterative definition of goodstein HOS
#10
I am very excited Mphlee! I do believe you and I have a very big overlap in how we view this problem. There's no need to credit me for something you came to just as independently as myself. Hopefully if we find the solution to quantum gravity, or something, this doesn't turn into a Newton vs Leibniz situation! (Though we all know Newton was just a dick who couldn't handle someone else figuring out the same result as him Shy )

I'm a little giddy, because I too have some more Mellin transform stuff up my sleeve. I haven't had time lately to work on it--but I believe the Mellin transform results should hold for all multipliers \(\lambda \neq 0\); thanks to the deep dive into Gottfried's work. (Previously we had to restrict \(|\lambda| \neq 0,1\).) So I am super pumped for what the future holds with tetration/iteration/ and *fingers crossed* semi-operators!

Regards, James
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [to do] fully iterative definition of goodstein HOS - by JmsNxn - 12/24/2022, 01:20 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Operator definition discrepancy? cacolijn 2 12,137 01/07/2013, 09:13 AM
Last Post: cacolijn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)