08/07/2022, 08:44 AM
(08/07/2022, 06:02 AM)Daniel Wrote:(08/05/2022, 03:57 AM)Catullus Wrote: Please letequal
, where
is defined for
as the Bouncing Factorial of x, but instead of starting at one you start at two and you replace the multiplication in the definition with (y+2)-ation.
Please letequal
.
Please letequal
.
I define my number as h^Guppyplex(Guppyplex)+1.
Wow Catullus, your dedication to nice typesetting is impressive.![]()
In my experience many problems in physics and mathematics have answers because they mean something. Even more, the best problems are at the perimeter of our understanding. Asking questions is great, but some of your questions are far beyond the limit of our collective progress. Understanding the motivation behind a problem is usually the first step in solving it. Paul Erdős talked about "The Book", of the ultimate mathematics theorems. This is a good guide for what to work on.
Sorry, I have no idea as to how to answer your question.
Great response, Daniel. I'd say the same thing Catullus; and I mean it as a compliment; your questions are on or near the perimeter. And that's what's needed from a good mathematician.

