07/19/2022, 07:59 AM
@James. This times James I don't fully agree since I was able to do something on it... and it seems beautiful... not very hard but the implication it has points to a greater field of study that in my opinion was already fully explored by Grothendieck and algebraic geometers. Keywords should be rational points of algebraic curves, rational functions over the torus and scheme theory.
@Catullus. Anyways Catullus, I'm not gonna share an inch of it. No time atm, have to do something more important and tbh I'd like to ear first some of your proposal to attack the problem, or I'd like you to share some of your preliminary analysis of the problem you are asking solutions to... I'm not sure to understand why you ask this, why do you find interesting? Why should I invest time on it exposing the material if you do not invest time researching/playing with your questions?
@Catullus. Anyways Catullus, I'm not gonna share an inch of it. No time atm, have to do something more important and tbh I'd like to ear first some of your proposal to attack the problem, or I'd like you to share some of your preliminary analysis of the problem you are asking solutions to... I'm not sure to understand why you ask this, why do you find interesting? Why should I invest time on it exposing the material if you do not invest time researching/playing with your questions?
Mother Law \(\sigma^+\circ 0=\sigma \circ \sigma^+ \)
\({\rm Grp}_{\rm pt} ({\rm RK}J,G)\cong \mathbb N{\rm Set}_{\rm pt} (J, \Sigma^G)\)