07/10/2022, 02:23 AM
(07/10/2022, 01:51 AM)JmsNxn Wrote:What about using tetcomplex.gp?(07/09/2022, 06:55 AM)Catullus Wrote: Then what was up with the spikes in the imaginary part with one precision, and then straight line at zero at a higher precision?
How do I use fatou.gp to show the non real valuedness of the analytic continuation of the Kneser method, with base the pith root of pi in a way that is not spikey?
You never use numerical approximation as a proof of anything. So, you can't. But the spikes are just noise in the program... nothing you can do about that--except write your own program that tries to reduce noise.
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ミ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ミ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\
ฅ(ミ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ミ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\

