If I do sexpinit(Pi^(1/Pi)), imag(sexp(x)) looks spikey.
If I increase the precision from \ps 21 to \ps 38, when I plot the imaginary part, it looks like a straight line at zero. (It also happened for higher precisions I tried.) Implying that it is real valued, but the analytic continuation of the Kneser method is not real valued at the pith root of pi. And then, when I tried to plot sexp(x) it said "*** incorrect type in gtodouble [t_REAL expected] (t_COMPLEX).".
Why was that happening?
Here is a graph of![[Image: svg.image?y=\Im(\sqrt%5B\pi%5D%7B\pi%7D\uparrow\uparrow%20x)]](https://latex.codecogs.com/svg.image?y=\Im(\sqrt%5B\pi%5D%7B\pi%7D\uparrow\uparrow%20x))
according to fatou.gp at \ps 21:
If I increase the precision from \ps 21 to \ps 38, when I plot the imaginary part, it looks like a straight line at zero. (It also happened for higher precisions I tried.) Implying that it is real valued, but the analytic continuation of the Kneser method is not real valued at the pith root of pi. And then, when I tried to plot sexp(x) it said "*** incorrect type in gtodouble [t_REAL expected] (t_COMPLEX).".
Why was that happening?
Here is a graph of
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ﾐ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ﾐ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\
ฅ(ﾐ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ﾐ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\