![]() |
|
From complex to real tetration - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: From complex to real tetration (/showthread.php?tid=1655) |
From complex to real tetration - Daniel - 10/16/2022 Edit: Background I have finished the first version of my Flow Mathematica function which I have submitted to Wolfram for review. I decompose the problem of tetration and the Ackermann function into that of fractional iteration that my Flow function handles and the classical Ackermann function. Having the flow function gets me 90% of anywhere I want to go working with tetration. The following is supposed to be a graph of tetration of e. Hopefully it is a broken implementation of tetration. The problem is the flow that crosses itself. Being homoclinic is a real problem for defining unique tetration. I wonder if anyone else has ever considered issue of being homoclinic. \[^xe\] ![]() RE: From complex to real tetration - bo198214 - 10/17/2022 I am still not exactly sure what the shown curve is. I guess it is the image of the function \( ^xe\) of some interval (a,b). If this is right, which interval is shown? Also I would assume that the points \(^1e=e\), \(^0e=1\) or \(^{-1}e=0\) are to be seen somewhere, but I don't see them. RE: From complex to real tetration - bo198214 - 10/21/2022 (10/17/2022, 07:46 AM)bo198214 Wrote: I am still not exactly sure what the shown curve is. Daniel, any clarification? RE: From complex to real tetration - Daniel - 10/21/2022 (10/21/2022, 07:48 PM)bo198214 Wrote:(10/17/2022, 07:46 AM)bo198214 Wrote: I am still not exactly sure what the shown curve is. The graph is pure bullshit because it is divergent. I took a bit to realize how broken it was. The range is from x=-20 to x=10. Just like logs, I'm having more success with \[^y (1+x)\]. |