![]() |
|
2^^^1.5 = ? - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: 2^^^1.5 = ? (/showthread.php?tid=1263) |
2^^^1.5 = ? - robo37 - 04/05/2020 Since 2Hn1 and 2Hn2 are fixed points at 2 and 4 I thought I'd experiment a little with 2Hn1.5 and curiously it seems to approach e, going from 3.5 to 3 to 2.828 to 2.745 as n increases. I'm curious to see if the trend continues with n=5, 2^^^1.5. I know it can be expressed as x when x^^x = 65536 but beyond that I'm stumped, anyone have any idea how to solve such an equation? RE: 2^^^1.5 = ? - Daniel - 04/10/2020 Sorry if I don't want to fight this war one number at a time. I believe that the most effective approach to the higher hyperoperators for problems like \( 2\uparrow{^k} 1.5 \) is to tackle the issue for all smooth functions \( f^t(x) \). This then gives a solution for tetration, pentation and all higher hyperoperators. http://tetration.org/Tetration/index.html https://www.overleaf.com/read/zjwkzgftsqkm RE: 2^^^1.5 = ? - sheldonison - 04/10/2020 (04/05/2020, 05:29 PM)robo37 Wrote: Since 2Hn1 and 2Hn2 are fixed points at 2 and 4 I thought I'd experiment a little with 2Hn1.5 and curiously it seems to approach e, going from 3.5 to 3 to 2.828 to 2.745 as n increases. \( 2\uparrow\uparrow 1.5 \) is tetration or iterated eexponentaton; Kneser's solution gives 2^^1.5~=2.7448 \( 2\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 1.5 \) requires analytic pentation, or iterated tetration, or isn't as well behaved or as uniquely defined, but using the lower fixed point of tetration base 2; Tet_2(-1.7439)=~-1.7439 gives an analalytic pentation for base 2, and then 2^^^1.5~=2.7029 There is also an analytic hexation function; 2^^^^1.5=~2.6729 fatou.gp implements it. - Sheldon |