Tetration Forum
How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - Printable Version

+- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? (/showthread.php?tid=1069)



How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/06/2016

How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ?

I have no idea how to do this.

This bugs me. Its a simple equation.

Regards

Tommy1729


RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/07/2016

It seems logical to consider F_{n+1}(x) = ( 1/2 ( exp(x) - f_{n}^[3](x) ) )^[1/2].


The limit of the iteration is then the solution.

But how about convergeance and analyticity ?


Regards

Tommy1729


RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/07/2016

Maybe start the iteration with exp^[1/3](x).

Regards

Tommy1729


RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 11/10/2021

(03/07/2016, 11:07 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: It seems logical to consider F_{n+1}(x) = ( 1/2 ( exp(x) - f_{n}^[3](x) ) )^[1/2].


The limit of the iteration is then the solution.

But how about convergeance and analyticity ?


Regards

Tommy1729

I see no reason why this would fail , assuming a good starting function and starting point x.

This should be investigated imo.

regards

tommy1729

Tom Marcel Raes