![]() |
|
z^^z ? - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: z^^z ? (/showthread.php?tid=577) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: z^^z ? - tommy1729 - 02/27/2011 (02/27/2011, 12:55 PM)bo198214 Wrote:(01/30/2011, 06:41 PM)tommy1729 Wrote:(01/29/2011, 11:18 PM)nuninho1980 Wrote: I edited to change from "e" to "superE" on my post #5, sorry. i suppose - without thinking about it - there is a fast converging method to find 1.6353... which also shows its transcendental. i dont have much time to explore it nowadays ... RE: z^^z ? - Stan - 04/05/2011 About the complex tetration thing... I thought (intuitively) that: e^^xi=cos(x)+sin(x)i e^^2xi=cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i)) e^^3xi=cos(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i))) sin(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i))) e^^kxi=cos(cos(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i))) sin(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i)))) +....2^k times sin(cos(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i))) sin(cos(cos(x)+sin(x)i) + sin(cos(x)+sin(x)i))))...etc.... But this is MERELY an intuitive hunch. Any thoughts on the matter? RE: z^^z ? - tommy1729 - 04/06/2011 that is completely wrong. you should really learn more about the basics of elementary math functions and complex numbers if you want to follow or contribute to this forum. also there is a difference between ^ and ^^ ! |