![]() |
|
fibonacci like - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: fibonacci like (/showthread.php?tid=473) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: fibonacci like - Gottfried - 07/17/2010 (07/17/2010, 08:45 AM)mike3 Wrote:(07/17/2010, 07:02 AM)Gottfried Wrote: I had tried it up to No - there is no problem. It only looked not easy enough for an idle afternoon so I didn't try to proceed further on my own. Your arguments make it actually easy to proceed and even more: you've done some nice graphs... So your msg was a nice and interesting contribution! Gottfried RE: fibonacci like - tommy1729 - 07/17/2010 (07/17/2010, 01:50 AM)mike3 Wrote: \( f(z) = f(z - 1) + f(z + i) \) nice post mike ! i conjecture that all non-periodic entire function solutions are of this form. note that i didnt say anything about the periodic solutions , not even sure they exist. i wonder if elliptic solutions exist. (once again flirting with double periodic functions )beautiful memories ; as an early teenager i defined 2 classes of functions as \( f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} C_n e^{G z} \) \( f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} D_n e^{E z} \) and assumed them to be equivalent , where G are the gaussian integers and E are the eisenstein integers. these were my " pre - taylor " series before i learned about taylor or laurent or even kahn series. similarly my gaussian / eisenstein polynomials were : \( f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{A} C_n e^{G z} \) \( f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{B} D_n e^{E z} \) for positive integer A and B , before i learned about polynomials or signomials. i did some investigations which could be considered pre-galois theory , pre-abelian variety , multisections and searching for zero's. and a lot of modular arithmetic , which seemed related. ( and abelian groups of order p^2 of course ) even today , i still find all that intresting. maybe mike has a similar history ? later i switched to number theory , but partially never forgot that. ( 'partially' because apparantly i forgot the relation to " fibonacci like " , i did find that fibo equation in my old papers of " gaussian polynomials " ) sorry for the emo. regards tommy1729 RE: fibonacci like - mike3 - 07/18/2010 Periodic ones exist; indeed all the "basis" solutions \( e^{uz} \) are periodic with complex period \( \frac{2\pi i}{u} \). RE: fibonacci like - bo198214 - 07/18/2010 (07/16/2010, 12:27 PM)tommy1729 Wrote:(07/16/2010, 07:03 AM)bo198214 Wrote: then its not a recursion, i.e. you dont have a unique solution for natural number arguments. A recursion needs to be determined on the natural numbers (or in other words unique), i.e. you can trace back every f(n) to some initial given f(0) or f(1) or so. Like in the fibonacci numbers f(n)=f(n-1)+f(n-2),f(0)=0,f(1)=1 Or even put it differently: when you write a computer program with the defining relation it must terminate. Yours is not a recursion just some functional equation. RE: fibonacci like - tommy1729 - 07/18/2010 (07/18/2010, 01:47 AM)mike3 Wrote: Periodic ones exist; indeed all the "basis" solutions \( e^{uz} \) are periodic with complex period \( \frac{2\pi i}{u} \). maybe there are solutions with other periods as well. playing around with the c_n coefficients we can construct another periodic solution i guess. i conjectured about non-periodic entire functions only , because it might be that there exist periodic solutions that are of a different form ? i was aware of the period of the "basis" solutions , i just didnt express myself very well. you are correct of course. i hope nobody minds this is not really about tetration. ( and apparantly recursion is reserved for the integers as bo explained ) |